Premier League Salary Cap Rejected as New Financial Rules Set

Premier League salary cap discussions have ended with top-flight clubs voting against its introduction, but significant changes to financial governance are now imminent. On November 21, all 20 Premier League clubs gathered to weigh in on proposals aimed at reshaping the league’s financial future, and while the controversial salary cap failed, a new framework is set to replace the existing Profit and Sustainability Rules (PSR), bringing sweeping reform to club finances.

Premier League Salary Cap Vote: Clubs Say No

Premier League salary cap plans were put to a decisive vote, with 12 clubs rejecting the idea, seven in favor, and one abstaining. The proposal was part of a broader review during a shareholders’ meeting, where topics like top-to-bottom anchoring, squad cost ratio (SCR), and Sustainability and Systemic Resilience (SSR) were discussed. While the salary cap was vetoed, other financial oversight mechanisms received more support, with SCR proposals passing unanimously.

What Replaces the Premier League Salary Cap?

The 2025-26 season will mark the end of PSR regulations, which currently limit club losses to £105 million over three years. Instead, SCR will take center stage. Under SCR, teams will only be allowed to spend up to 85% of their total revenue on wages and transfer fees for players, coaches, and agents. This aligns closely with UEFA’s model, under which English teams in European competitions can spend just 70% of their income on these costs.

Details of the Squad Cost Ratio (SCR)

According to a Premier League statement, “SCR will regulate clubs’ on-pitch spending to 85% of their football revenue and net profit/loss on player sales. Clubs have a multi-year allowance of 30% to exceed the 85% limit. However, using this allowance comes with a levy, and once exhausted, clubs must comply with the cap or face sporting sanctions.” The new rules aim to streamline financial oversight, enhance transparency through in-season monitoring, and reduce complexity by focusing strictly on football-related costs.

Sustainability and Systemic Resilience (SSR) Rules Explained

SSR takes a three-pronged approach to financial health. The rules ensure clubs maintain enough resources to manage spending and revenue fluctuations, focus on long-term financial planning, and safeguard balance sheet strength. New measures include annual assessments like the Working Capital Test, Liquidity Test, and Positive Equity Test to evaluate a club’s short, medium, and long-term stability.

Why the Salary Cap Was Rejected

The Premier League salary cap would have imposed strict spending limits linked to the revenue of the division’s lowest earners—a model known as “top to bottom anchoring.” This would restrict clubs from spending more than five times the combined prize and broadcast revenue of the team finishing bottom. While advocates argued for improved competitive balance, concerns about legal challenges from players’ unions and potential restrictions on club ambition ultimately led to the plan’s demise.

How Clubs and Stakeholders Were Consulted

Over the past two years, extensive consultations with club shareholders, legal teams, and financial experts shaped the new financial framework. Shadow monitoring of SCR and TBA (top to bottom anchoring) rules throughout the current season allowed for real-world evaluation of their impact. The Premier League also examined UEFA’s SCR model and involved key external stakeholders such as the Professional Footballers’ Association (PFA) and agent representatives.

Implications for the Future

The shift from Premier League salary cap proposals to the SCR model reflects a move towards sustainable financial management without stifling ambition. Clubs can continue to invest in squads and infrastructure, but with limits designed to protect the league’s long-term value and competitiveness. Transparent monitoring and clear sanctions are intended to maintain fairness.

For more news and ongoing updates on Premier League financial reforms, visit for more news.

Opinion: Is the New System the Right Move?

While rejecting a Premier League salary cap might disappoint those hoping for even greater parity, the adoption of SCR and SSR appears to be a balanced solution. It acknowledges the need for financial safeguards without imposing rigid caps that could stifle growth or invite legal disputes. Time will tell if these reforms truly deliver stability and competitive balance, but the Premier League’s commitment to evolving with the times is clear.