Ruben Amorim’s Tactics Questioned After Man Utd’s Brentford Loss

Ruben Amorim’s tactical approach for Manchester United came under intense scrutiny following the team’s disappointing 3-1 defeat against Brentford in the Premier League. The Portuguese manager faced criticism from pundits, most notably Micah Richards on Match of the Day, for a series of second-half decisions that left United’s structure looking disjointed and ineffective.

Ruben Amorim’s Tactical Tweaks Backfire Against Brentford

From the outset, Ruben Amorim’s tactics for Manchester United appeared ambitious, hoping to outmaneuver Brentford’s compact and disciplined setup. However, as the match progressed, Amorim made a number of personnel changes without significantly altering the team’s tactical formation. This meant several players found themselves playing in unfamiliar roles, which contributed to confusion and inconsistency on the pitch.

Micah Richards was quick to highlight the consequences of these decisions during his post-match analysis. He pointed out that while substitutions can inject energy and fresh ideas, simply swapping players without adapting the overall system often leads to more harm than good. “You could see the players didn’t know where they were supposed to be,” Richards remarked. “Amorim kept switching personnel, but the shape stayed the same, and it just didn’t work.”

Manchester United’s Defensive Vulnerabilities Exposed

Throughout the second half, Brentford capitalized on Manchester United’s uncertainty. The lack of cohesion among United’s midfield and defensive lines opened up spaces for Brentford to exploit, leading to a flurry of chances and, ultimately, three well-taken goals. Despite United having their moments in possession, they failed to show their usual composure in transition, with the tactical confusion undermining their efforts to regain control.

Amorim’s Substitutes Struggle to Make an Impact

Amorim’s substitutions, intended to shake up the game and press Brentford back, had minimal effect. The players introduced found it difficult to adapt quickly, further highlighting the risk of making changes without clear tactical adjustments. As a result, Manchester United’s attacking threat waned, and Brentford’s confidence grew, sealing a memorable win for the hosts.

Fan Frustration Grows With Tactical Decisions

For many Manchester United supporters, the defeat was particularly hard to swallow given the promise shown earlier in Amorim’s tenure. Social media was rife with criticism of the manager’s approach, with fans echoing the sentiments expressed by Richards and other pundits. Some questioned whether Amorim’s style is suited to the Premier League, while others called for a more settled lineup and consistent strategy moving forward.

What’s Next for Ruben Amorim and Manchester United?

The loss to Brentford leaves Manchester United with plenty to ponder as they look ahead to their upcoming fixtures. Ruben Amorim now faces pressure to reassess his tactical philosophy and find a system that maximizes his squad’s strengths while maintaining defensive solidity. The Premier League is unforgiving, and continued experimentation without clear direction may further erode confidence within the squad and fanbase.

United’s next match against Sunderland will be a crucial test, both for Amorim’s credentials and the players’ resolve. The manager’s ability to respond to criticism and adapt his approach could define United’s season. For supporters eager for positive change, the hope is that lessons learned from the Brentford defeat will bring about a more settled, effective setup in the matches to come.

For more news and updates on Manchester United and the latest in football, visit for more news.

Opinion: Amorim Must Find Balance—Fast

While Ruben Amorim’s ambition to implement his tactical vision at Manchester United is commendable, the Brentford defeat offers a clear warning. Constant changes without a solid structural foundation can leave even top players exposed. To succeed in the Premier League, Amorim must strike a better balance between innovation and stability—his next moves will be critical.